Bitcoin and the Hidden Forces Behind Its Manipulation

Yesterday, we covered how silver was manipulated for over a decade following JP Morgan’s acquisition of Bear Stearns’ books and short positions during the Global Financial Crisis.

Now, attention turns to Bitcoin.

Since the October 10 capitulation, Bitcoin has been a major underperformer, diverging sharply from other risk assets. While equities and commodities push to all-time highs, Bitcoin remains down over 20% from its all time high. This underperformance has triggered questions about whether price suppression is in play, and whether we’re seeing echoes of what happened in the silver market.

We know that several market makers were hit hard in October, left with significant holes in their balance sheets. To stabilise, those that survived shifted their priorities from providing liquidity to preserving capital.

In the aftermath of the crash, we saw clear structural shifts in market behaviour. Quote sizes shrank, spreads widened, and risk appetite dropped. More notably, assets were offloaded not in a panic but through deliberate and systematic selling. The goal was to reduce exposure, rebuild capital buffers, and stay within internal risk limits.

There’s also been consistent chatter that not all market makers survived the event. Some are rumoured to have been absorbed or backstopped by larger players or exchanges. While specific deals are rarely public, the pattern fits with previous periods of stress.

A useful comparison is the Bear Stearns collapse. When JP Morgan took over, they didn’t just acquire the company, they inherited its positions. Those didn’t disappear; they had to be managed and gradually unwound, which led to over a decade of silver price manipulation.

If failed market makers were absorbed by exchanges or larger funds in October, the same logic applies. The distressed inventory doesn’t vanish. It eventually has to be redistributed into the market. When that happens in a low-liquidity, low-risk appetite environment, it can lead to sustained, flow-driven selling that suppresses prices even without any formal coordination.

That’s exactly what we’ve seen in recent months.

Bitcoin and altcoins struggled to sustain any rallies. Each attempt was met with aggressive selling, driving prices lower, classic signs of a seller-dominated market. It’s visible in the charts: rallies faded quickly, and momentum consistently failed to follow through.

No Advice Warning

The information in this newsletter is general only. It should not be taken as constituting professional advice from the author - Stormrake PTY LTD.

Stormrake is not a financial adviser and does not provide financial product advice. You should consider seeking independent legal, financial, taxation or other advice to check how the information relates to your unique circumstances. Stormrake is not liable for any loss caused, whether due to negligence or otherwise arising from the use of, or reliance on, the information provided directly or indirectly, by this newsletter.

Disclaimer

All statements made in this newsletter are made in good faith and we believe they are accurate and reliable. Stormrake does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information that is contained here, except insofar as any liability under statute cannot be excluded. Stormrake, its directors, employees and their representatives do not accept any liability for any error or omission in this newsletter or for any resulting loss or damage suffered by the recipient or any other person. Unless otherwise specified, copyright of information provided in this newsletter is owned by Stormrake. You may not alter or modify this information in any way, including the removal of this copyright notice.