Inside the Zone: What Bitcoin's Production Cost Tells Us Now

To receive the Morning Note in your inbox, subscribe here: https://stormrake.substack.com/

Last week we covered the AI pivot underway among Bitcoin miners, where rising energy costs are pushing some miners to switch part of their operations over to AI computing instead of mining Bitcoin. Today we’re digging into the idea behind that story: Bitcoin’s cost of production. What it is, why it matters for price, and how it can help us spot a bottom.

Bitcoin is currently trading at $64,600, which puts it inside what we call the cost of production zone. It’s below the top end of that zone, but still above the middle. We’ll explain exactly what that means below.

What Is “Cost of Production” and Why Does It Matter?

Mining Bitcoin costs money. Miners need to buy hardware and pay for electricity to run it, and that adds up to a real dollar cost for every Bitcoin they produce. Think of it like the cost of digging gold out of the ground: if the gold price falls below what it costs to mine it, miners lose money and eventually shut down.

The same thing happens with Bitcoin. When the price falls close to what it costs to produce, the least efficient miners start losing money and switch off their machines. Fewer miners means the network adjusts, and it becomes cheaper again to mine relative to the price. This tends to create a floor under the market.

It’s not a hard floor though. Miners can run at a loss for a while before they give up, and the cost of production itself moves around depending on Bitcoin’s price, energy costs and mining difficulty. So it’s best to think of this as a zone, not an exact line.

Checking Two Different Sources

We’re tracking the model above from Simple Mining, and also checked it against data from Cambridge University’s CBECI (Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index), a well respected academic source. Both currently agree that Bitcoin is trading within this cost zone:

The model above: average estimate of $50,821, with an upper bound of $67,526
Cambridge (CBECI): estimated at $43,256, with an upper bound of $75,922

At $64,600, Bitcoin is sitting well above the Cambridge estimate and below the upper end of the model’s range. The two sources broadly agree on the general zone, which gives us more confidence that Bitcoin genuinely is in this cost of production territory, rather than it being a quirk of one particular model.

One thing worth flagging: Cambridge’s number only accounts for electricity costs. It doesn’t include things like hardware, rent or staff wages, which real miners also have to pay. That’s a big part of why its estimate runs lower than the model above, and why the true cost for many miners is likely higher than the Cambridge figure alone suggests.

What History Tells Us

Bitcoin has spent time in this cost of production zone before, and both previous major bottoms happened here:

December 2018: Cambridge estimated the cost of production at around $3,269
November 2022: Cambridge estimated the cost of production at around $14,704

Both of those turned out to be major cycle lows.

There’s also a longer term pattern worth noting. Each bear market low has landed a bit higher up in the cost of production zone than the one before it, rather than falling further below it. In the early days, Bitcoin’s price would crash well under the bottom of the zone before turning around. More recently, it has tended to bottom closer to the middle or top of the zone instead. This pattern has held consistently since 2015.

That matters for how we read the current situation. Just because Bitcoin is in the cost of production zone now doesn’t mean it has to fall further. If the historical pattern continues, a shallower bottom within the zone is more likely than a deep crash below it.

The Key Points

Bitcoin is currently trading in the cost of production zone, with two independent data sources in agreement.
Time spent in this zone has historically lined up with major market bottoms.
Cost of production should be thought of as a zone of support, not an exact price.
Over time, bottoms have tended to land higher up in the zone rather than lower, so the current setup doesn’t automatically point to further downside.

Zooming out, periods where Bitcoin trades in this cost of production zone have historically coincided with the later stages of past bear markets, both in 2018 and 2022. That’s the pattern worth watching, whichever way this cycle plays out.

Stormrake Spotlight: Pax Gold (PAXG) ($4,331)

Source: https://www.tradingview.com/x/P8kHH7EU/

The bears have reminded PAXG that they are still there and in for the fight, sending it down 2% over the last 24 hours. It still remains above key moving averages, so there’s nothing to worry about yet and the momentum stays bullish, though the bears remain a threat to stop this move at the resistance zone.

BTC/USD Key Levels and Price Action:

Source: https://www.tradingview.com/x/HaDfbIOn/

Whilst Bitcoin has only increased by 0.34%, it’s incredibly constructive. Commodities and traditional markets have pulled back whilst BTC is looking to sustain this breakout. This current breakout is a must hold for bulls across multiple timeframes. The longer BTC stays above and continues higher without coming back to the $63.8k level, the better.

To receive the Morning Note in your inbox, subscribe here: https://stormrake.substack.com/

*All prices are denominated in USD unless stated otherwise*

Written by Alexandar Artis

Create a brokerage account today

No Advice Warning

The information in this newsletter is general only. It should not be taken as constituting professional advice from the author - Stormrake PTY LTD.

Stormrake is not a financial adviser and does not provide financial product advice. You should consider seeking independent legal, financial, taxation or other advice to check how the information relates to your unique circumstances. Stormrake is not liable for any loss caused, whether due to negligence or otherwise arising from the use of, or reliance on, the information provided directly or indirectly, by this newsletter.

Disclaimer

All statements made in this newsletter are made in good faith and we believe they are accurate and reliable. Stormrake does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information that is contained here, except insofar as any liability under statute cannot be excluded. Stormrake, its directors, employees and their representatives do not accept any liability for any error or omission in this newsletter or for any resulting loss or damage suffered by the recipient or any other person. Unless otherwise specified, copyright of information provided in this newsletter is owned by Stormrake. You may not alter or modify this information in any way, including the removal of this copyright notice.